You are currently browsing the archives for the Internacional category.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
February 21, 2007 by votepornadie.com.
Managua, Feb 20 (Prensa Latina) The Sandinista deputies in the National Assembly will try to establish a participative democratic system in Nicaragua, as opposed to the current presidential system, a legislative source said on Tuesday.
According to Rene Nunez, a deputy from the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) and president of the board of directors of the unicameral Congress, the initiative was presented by President Daniel Ortega himself.
In statements to local media, Nunez recalled that Ortega, who took office on January 10, has always favored a leading role for the legislative power and the people.
The objective, added Nunez, would be to guarantee citizens active participation in the decision-making process.
The FSLN deputy admitted, however, that consensus, which does not exist at present, among all four parliamentary forces that make up the National Assembly, is needed to achieve that goal.
Two-thirds of all 92 deputies, that is 62, must vote in favor to pass any constitutional reform.
The FSLN has 38 seats, in addition to three allies, while the Liberal Constitutionalist Party (PLC) has 25 seats, plus 22 from the Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance (ALN) and three from the Sandinista Renovating Movement (MRS).
The 92nd seat is reserved by law to former President Enrique Bolanos, who would align with the ALN.
http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID=%7BEBE824A6-25BA-4254-AEEF-9873A358656E%7D)&language=EN
Posted in Nicaragua, Gobierno, inEnglish, Internacional, Medios, Poder Ejecutivo, Poder Legislativo, FSLN | No Comments »
February 7, 2007 by votepornadie.com.
Por By Eduardo Dimas (Progreso Weekly), 01/02/2007
| At the beginning, in 2003, the project seemed utopian. The governments of Venezuela and Cuba proclaimed ALBA (the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas), a concept created by Hugo Chávez with the support of Cuban President Fidel Castro. At the same time, the U.S. government and the oligarchies from several Latin American nations pushed the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas), which was to begin operations in January 2005, according to W. Bush. That didn’t happen.
The FTAA was running into reefs. Several Latin American countries, led by Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina — all members of Mercosur — refused to enter into negotiations that would exclusively benefit U.S. interests to the detriment of their own nations’ interests. The Doha summit failed, as a consequence of the refusal of the big economic powers (the U.S., the European Union and Japan) to stop subsidizing their agricultural products. Meanwhile, Venezuela and Cuba entered a series of accords on matters of health care, education and the economy, for the benefit of both countries. Operation Miracle restored the sight of thousands of Venezuelans afflicted with cataracts and other eye diseases. About 28,000 Cubans doctors and health technicians were in Venezuela, donating their services. At the same time, a literacy campaign using the Cuban system “Yes I Can” allowed more than one million Venezuelans to learn to read and write, and to go on to higher education. In exchange, Cuba received 98,000 barrels of crude oil per day, and protocols were signed to start up the refinery at Cienfuegos. Credit lines were opened so the island might acquire Venezuelan products, which led to growth in the small and medium-size industries in that country. Social, banking and commercial accounts of new types were established between two Third-World nations. In early 2006, after the inauguration of President Evo Morales, Bolivia also joined ALBA and welcomed Operation Miracle and the literacy campaign. Bolivia, one of the region’s poorest countries, could provide free medical coverage for the first time in its history. Hospitals donated by Cuba and Venezuela were built in strategic locations. At present, Operation Miracle has restored the sight of thousands of Bolivians, Panamanians, Peruvians, Nicaraguans and even a U.S. citizen. At the beginning of this year, the new governments in Ecuador and Nicaragua announced their intention to join ALBA, bringing the number of nations that participate in this new form of relationship between peoples to five. This, despite the fact that ALBA has faced and faces problems derived from the incomprehension of other governments. ALBA has even been looked upon with contempt by powerful economic sectors that refuse to accept the changes occurring in the region. What has been missing? Political will. The desire to pay off the old social debt that the Latin American oligarchies owe their people. However, other elements of change, such as the Southern Gas Pipeline, PetroCaribe, and the idea of a Bank of the South — all proposed by Chávez — have been welcomed because they suit the various governments’ economic interests and future ambitions, especially those with a nationalist vision. It is part of the game that necessarily has to be played to achieve integration in Latin America. But ALBA not only dreams. It advances. On Jan. 24, the governments of Venezuela and Cuba signed 16 accords of cooperation in areas such as steel manufacturing, telecommunications, agriculture and tourism, totaling about $1.854 billion. So far, both nations have entered into 12 joint ventures involving different sectors of the economy and services. The common element in all those instruments is the interrelation and complementation of the two economies. The Venezuelan economy boasts great economic riches, especially crude oil. The Cuban economy has a scientific-cultural base in many branches of human knowledge that permit it to deal with the execution of major economic plans for which it has no resources. One of the main accords is to promote the extraction and refining of Cuban ferronickel for the production of stainless steel in Venezuela. To that end, $600 million will be invested in the steel plants and about $521 million in the ferronickel plant in Cuba. One of the accords envisions the creation of a Multidisciplinary Group for the study and start-up of an international system of telecommunications between the two countries. An underwater fiberoptic cable will be laid between La Guaira, state of Vargas, in Venezuela and the city of Siboney, in the province of Santiago de Cuba. The cable will have two additional linkage points for any countries in the Caribbean and Central America that wish to share the connection. The tourism agreement envisions the development of recreational tourism through the construction of hotels and resorts in several keys (islets) in both countries. The agreement allows 100,000 low-income Venezuelans to spend their vacations in Cuba any time of the year. In addition, an accord provides that rice produced in Venezuela be exported to Cuba. In the important (and, for Cuba, fundamental) industry of oil prospecting, another accord authorizes Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA) to take over the search for crude oil in four regions in Cuba’s territorial waters on the Gulf of Mexico. According to geological studies, major fields of crude and natural gas exist in those regions. In this manner, PDVSA joins six other transnational oil companies that carry out prospecting in Cuban waters. This accord is in addition to the pact signed in April 2006 between PDVSA and Cuba Petróleo (CUPET) for the refining of heavy hydrocarbons in the refinery of Cienfuegos and the exchange of technology. Venezuela thus becomes Cuba’s main trading partner. Last year, the volume of commercial transactions between the two countries rose to $2.64 billion. To some, it may seem a small amount, when compared with other countries or even some transnational corporations, but these are small economies — particularly Cuba’s — and this is only the beginning. The main beneficiary is, of course, the Cuban economy, which is still feeling the consequences of the disappearance of the Soviet Union and the rest of the socialist bloc, plus the increasingly harsh measures that are part of the blockade imposed by the United States more than 46 years ago. With the incorporation of Bolivia, Nicaragua and, later, Ecuador, ALBA is no longer just a dream of justice and cooperation among nations but a palpable reality, as demonstrated by the accords signed by Cuba and Venezuela. After closing the signing ceremony, President Chávez delivered a long speech, from which I have extracted two paragraphs that I consider fundamental: “…the ALBA continues to advance, the ALBA continues to concretize and deepen, while — as comrade Lula said recently in Rio de Janeiro — nobody talks about the FTAA anymore,” Chávez said. “About ALBA and the mechanisms and alternative processes of integration people talk and will talk in days to come with more profusion, more intensity. Not only that, but these mechanisms will concretize in a progressive manner, in a growing manner …” Later, he said: “Here, we are truly willing to be free […] and to give an example to the other nations, to the other governments, a modest example of how, with political will, we can — and this is Fidel’s phrase — achieve miracles. With political will, near-miracles can be achieved, and that is crushing for the neoliberal theories, which would rather leave everything to the sacrosanct market.” It may be too soon to declare a definitive victory over the FTAA, which has been converted by the United States into free-trade agreements with various countries. The road before ALBA is plagued by powerful interests that oppose the well-being of the people, and reject economic development with justice and equity, which is the foundation of this plan. Those powerful interests mainly oppose the region’s independence and sovereignty. How far will it be possible to go? It’s hard to tell. Perhaps until the total emancipation of Latin America, a condition that is closely linked to the economic and political integration of its states. But now ALBA advances and the union of various peoples and governments of Latin America is strengthened, joining other, no less promising phenomena that lead to integration. Let us hope that nothing and nobody can stop that process. http://www.alcaabajo.cu/design/read.tpl.html?news_id_obj_id=1002100 |
Posted in ALBA, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Internacional, Medios | No Comments »
January 31, 2007 by votepornadie.com.
1. Escucho en Telesur al presidente de Nicaragua Daniel Ortega -quien fustiga la política neoliberal de sus antecesores, reconoce la “postración” de su pueblo y denuncia las políticas de libre mercado por ser injustas e inequitativas- y me pone a pensar que esta vez sí cambiarán un poco las cosas en ese país que se encuentra en los dos últimos lugares de América, “a la par de Haití”, en cuanto a desarrollo económico se refiere. Pero después recuerdo a Sergio Ramírez –quien fuera miembro moderado de la Junta de Reconstrucción Nacional y hoy parece haberse dedicado sabrosamente a la literatura- escribir que la Revolución nicaragüense “favoreció a dirigentes y partidarios del Frente Sandinista en todos los niveles, rapiña que llegó a ser conocida como “la piñata”.
2. Dijo Ortega en síntesis que heredó un país postrado por la pobreza y se ve como si se hubiera librado una guerra sin balas; que el libre mercado no es justo ni equitativo, que los políticos han sido impuestos por Norteamérica, que los gobiernos que le precedieron fueron neoliberales, que ese modelo no ha dado buenos resultados, que hay 35 por ciento de analfabetismo así como enriquecimiento de unos pocos, que el 70 por ciento son pobres y el 27 por ciento de los niños padecen hambre, que se van a revisar los acuerdos con el FMI y que habrá cooperación con Venezuela y Hugo Chávez, así como con Bolivia. Ortega encabezó la revolución que triunfó en julio de 1979, presidió la Junta de Reconstrucción Nacional y fue el primer presidente de 1986 a 1990.
3. El gobierno yanqui de Reagan no podía permitir el surgimiento de un “nuevo país comunista” en América. Los sandinistas nacieron marcados como enemigos de los EEUU desde que el guerrillero Augusto César Sandino, desde los años veinte hasta que fue asesinado en 1934, luchó contra la ocupación y el saqueo usamericano de Nicaragua. En la Junta de Reconstrucción –integrada a la caída del dictador Somoza- por un “empresario progresista” (Robelo), un combatiente militar patriota (Hassan), un intelectual socialdemócrata (Ramírez), un sandinista (Ortega) y una empresaria de poderos periódico (Chamorro) las confrontaciones de intereses entre sus miembros determinaron rupturas políticas, incluso el impulso de “La contra” por Reagan.
4. La agricultura y la ganadería, así como una industria poco desarrollada que atiende la producción de azúcar, cemento, cerveza y cigarrillos, son la base de esa economía “postrada” de que habla Ortega en esa Nicaragua que hoy cuenta con cerca de seis millones de habitantes. Si bien al interior del sandinismo se cometieron errores políticos graves, incluso muchos abusos de corrupción, -como dice el hoy neoliberal escritor Ramírez- la realidad es que la derrota de la Revolución nicaragúense y del sandinismo debe ubicarse en las acciones de saboteo y bloqueo que ejerció Reagan, llegando a minar los puertos el país. Nicaragua, además de miserable, estaba totalmente sometida por los poderosos capitalistas asociados y al servicio de Norteamérica.
5. La realidad es que en los llamados países democráticos como México, EEUU o España, los gobiernos no se enredan ni pierden el tiempo buscando proyectos para construir sociedades justas e igualitarias, como lo hacen los izquierdistas o socialistas. En los países de la democracia capitalista la preocupación del Estado y su gobierno es asegurar que los grandes empresarios nacionales y extranjeros inviertan sus capitales y logren buenas ganancias. Para ellos los trabajadores sólo deben trabajar, es decir, producir y cuidar lo intereses de las empresas que les proporcionan medios para vivir, aunque éstos sean miserables. En el PRI y el PAN, en los partidos demócrata y republicano, se busca cómo continuar ejerciendo el poder y controlando la riqueza.
6. Cuando triunfó la revolución cubana en 1959 EEUU no solo se negó a apoyarla sino que puso toda su fuerza para destruirla; Fidel tuvo que pedir ayuda a la URSS para superar el bloqueo económico y poder mantener la revolución. Cuando triunfó en 1979 la revolución en Nicaragua en EEUU el presidente Carter estaba a punto de dejarle el cargo a Reagan, y la URSS comenzaba a desestabilizarse después de invadir Afganistán y comenzar sus crisis internas. Sin enemigo al frente el gobierno de imperial de Reagan, aliado con la ministra Tatcher, se dedicó a apoyar a la oposición derechista que luchaba contra el sandinismo. México, gobernado por López Portillo, Costa Rica por Carazo, Panamá por Torrijos y Venezuela por Carlos Andrés Pérez, apoyó la lucha insurgente.
7 Pero, ¿qué podrá hacer Ortega en sus próximos cuatro años de gobierno tomando en cuenta de que hizo alianzas con “liberales y somocistas”, con derechistas y grupos políticos contrarios? La revista Proceso publicó que Ortega eligió a un exdirigente de “ La Contra” nicaragüense como compañero de fórmula, para la vicepresidencia, a Jaime Morales Carazo; que para asegurar votos incorporó a dirigentes del Partido Liberal Nacionalista liderado por seguidores del extinto exdictador Somoza. Se dice incluso que la política nicaragüense es lo más parecido a un baile de máscaras”. Al parecer Ortega tiene amarrado pies y manos y si quiere cambiar un poquito el rumbo tendrá que actuar con inteligencia aprovechando la solidaridad de los países del Mercosur.
8. Por cierto el literato Sergio Ramírez, al parecer enemigo de Ortega, está muy “preocupado” por el desaire a Calderón y el ensalzamiento de Hugo Chávez en la toma de posesión. Dice que le hubiera gustado que Ortega le preguntara a Calderón si revivirá el proyecto yanqui Plan Puebla Panamá. Es vergonzoso ya el nivel en que cayó el pobre literato que fuera dirigente de la Junta de Reconstrucción. ¿Por qué Chávez? Pues porque suministró dos plantas eléctricas que comenzarán a generar energía en las próximas dos semanas y porque en cuatro semanas más se inaugurarán otras plantas que cubrirán la mitad del déficit actual de electricidad. Son sólo paliativos pero esos apoyos, como los alfabetizadores, médicos y profesores cubanos en muchos países, son muy concretos.
9. No me atrevería a asegurar que las cosas saldrán bien en Nicaragua, pero sí puedo afirmar que en la actual coyuntura política internacional Ortega puede jugar un papel mucho más importante que Calderón o Uribe en defensa de los intereses de los pueblos de América. En política internacional se están decidiendo asuntos de gran trascendencia. En la UNU, la OPEP, la OTAN, la APEC, la OCDE, el Mercomun, el Mercosur, la OMC, etcétera, se deciden políticas a las que los países deben someterse. El papel de China, la India, Brasil, Venezuela, Cuba y demás países, entre ellos Nicaragua, frente al imperialismo yanqui, es muy importante. Por eso el gobierno de Daniel Ortega, con todo y sus nefastas alianzas, la corrupción del sandinismo y las grandes dificultades económicas, sigue siendo importante.
Posted in latinoamerica, Nicaragua, La izquierda, Internacional, Medios | No Comments »